Congressional Proposal Would Put 923,400 Children, Seniors, and Arizonans with Disabilities at Risk of Hunger
923,400 people in Arizona who participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) could be at risk of going hungry if Congress moves forward with a plan to cut $230 billion or more from the program over nearly 10 years. The specific details of the cuts are not public yet, but some Congressional leaders are calling for states to be required to pay a portion of Arizonan’s SNAP food benefits for the first time. Congress should reject this proposal and protect SNAP from harmful budget cuts.
To fund a portion of SNAP food benefits, Arizona would need to raise revenue, cut funding for other state-funded programs and services, cut SNAP benefit levels, restrict program eligibility, or some combination of these – all options that would cost Arizona more or take food assistance away from Arizonans. This proposal comes as Arizona cut programs and delayed costs, among other budget gimmicks, to resolve a $1.7 billion budget shortfall last summer. While Arizona’s current budget outlook is not in the red, it’s dangerously close.
Congressional leaders have not said how much they would force states to pay of SNAP food benefit costs. But if they create a new state match of 50% of SNAP benefits, it would cost Arizona about $100 million in 2026; a 25% match requirement would cost Arizona $501 million. It would be the first time that the federal government did not fully fund the cost of food benefits, according to a new report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Congressional members are pushing deep federal spending cuts to SNAP, Medicaid, and other vital services to “offset” the costs of extending and expanding tax cuts for the wealthy. Their tax cuts for households with incomes in the top 1 percent alone would cost roughly $1.1 trillion over 10 years. Forcing states to help pay SNAP benefits would let federal policymakers enact unpopular cuts while making someone else — state policymakers — decide which participants lose benefits.
“Listen to families. Every time a mom or dad goes to the grocery store, they are paying more for less,” said January Contreras, Executive Director of Children’s Action Alliance. “Our congressional delegation needs to hold the line on good policy that keeps children and seniors from going hungry and brings our tax dollars back into our local economy.”
“The prospect of this radical and sudden cost shift comes at a time when the Arizona budget is already strained,” said Geraldine Miranda. Economic Policy Analyst for the Arizona Center for Economic Progress. “As state legislators negotiate to work key tax and spending priorities into a balanced budget for next fiscal year, even a small new SNAP matching requirement would force wrenching trade-offs between letting more children going hungry and funding other important public services, such as education and public safety.”
If Arizona were required to match even 10% of SNAP benefit costs, the $200 million price to ensure families don’t lose food assistance would be equivalent to eliminating the child care waiting list for the final 6 months of the current budget. Arizona could pass along some of the cost to counties and cities, either directly or indirectly.
In Arizona, more than 68% of participating families have children, and almost 29% of participating families include seniors or adults with disabilities. Research shows SNAP reduces food insecurity and is linked to improved health, education, and economic outcomes and to lower medical costs for participants.
SNAP benefits are spent at more than 4,600 grocery stores in the state. Every $1 in additional spending on SNAP benefits in a weak economy generates $1.54 in economic activity when households use their benefits to shop at local businesses in their communities.
